Interaksi Simbolik untuk Akuntansi Sektor Publik

A. Razak

doi:10.31573/eksos.v11i1.576

A. Razak Politeknik Negeri Pontianak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31573/eksos.v11i1.576

Keywords: social object, interaction, symbolic interaction, behavior

Abstract

This research is important, especially to explore further the behavioral aspects behind the budget. Researchers want to get a more real and definite picture of who is behind the power in the process of preparing the Regional Government budget. how their life and behavior; how they think and make decisions; as well as other people around them. All of these aspects may very well influence the behavior of the executive and legislature in the practice of decision-making in the process of drafting the Regional Government budget that has been running so far. Based on the problems above, the goal to be achieved is "understanding the behavior of the executive and legislature in the process of preparing the Government budget" and the importance of understanding symbols when someone uses Symbolic Interaction theory. Symbols are social objects in an interaction. It is used as representation and communication which is determined by the people who use it. These people give meaning, create and change the object in the interaction. These social symbols can be in the form of physical objects (objects that are visible to the eye), words (which are used to represent physical objects, feelings, ideas, etc.), and actions (whatever people do). often gives meaning to communicate with others).

References

Adiprigandani, Siti. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Diktat Workshop Metode Riset Kualitatif: Konsep dan Aplikasi. LSM Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Tidak Dipublikasikan.
Anderson, James. 1969. Public Policy Making, Second edition: Holt, Renehart and Winston, New York.
Argyris, Chris. 1952. The Impact of Budgets on People, Ithaca: School of Business and Public Administration, Cornel University.
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism, Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliff. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Burrell, Gibson and Gareth Morgan. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Ashgate Publishing Company, USA.
Candy, P. C. 1989. Alternative Paradigms in Educational Research. Australian Educational Researcher, Vol. 16.
Charon, Joel M. 1979. Symbolic Interactionism: an Introduction, an Interpretation, an Integration. Sixth Edition. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: prentice Hall, Inc.
Charon, Joel M. 1995. Ten Questions, A Sociological Perspective. Second Edition. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Charon, Joel M. 1998. Symbolic Interactionism: an Introduction, an Interpretation, an Integration. Sixth Edition. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: prentice Hall, Inc.
Charon, Joel M. 1999. The Meaning of Sociology, A Reader (ed). Sixth Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Chua, Wai Fong. 1986. Radical Developments in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review, Vol. LXI. No.4: pp. 601 - 631.
Collins, Randall. 1985. Three Sociological Traditions, New York, Oxford University Press.
Defleur, Melvin L. 1971. Sociology: Man in Society. Glenview, III: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Etzioni, Amitai. 1988. The Moral Dimension: Towards a New Economics. New York: The Free Press.
Faqih, Mansour. 2001. Sesat Pikir Teori Pembangunan dan Globalisasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Insist.
Freund, Julien. 1969. The Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Vintage Books. Waveland Press Inc.
Gusfield, Joseph R. 1983. Public Problems as Phenomena: The Shape of a Humanistic Social Science. Siegwart Lindenberg, James S. Coleman, Stefan Nowak (editor), Approaches to Social Theory. New.York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hanurawan, Fatah. 2005. Pendekatan Positivistik, Interpretif dan Kritis dalam Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Malang: Seminar UNM.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolusion Revolutions; Peran Paradigma dalam Revolusi Sains. Bandung: PT. Rosda Karya.
Linton, Ralph. 1984. Antropologi: Suatu Penyelidikan Tentang Manusia, Bandung: Jemmars.
Littlejohn, Stephen W. 1992. Theories of Human Communication. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Ludigdo, Unti. 2006. Sekilas Pengantar untuk Memahami Metode Penelitian Dalam Paradigma Interpretif. Bahan Pelatihan Metodologi Penelitian Pendekatan Multiparadigma: Breakthrough untuk Transformasi Akuntansi. Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Brawijaya. Mei, 2006.
Maliki, Zainuddin. 2004. Narasi Agung: Tiga Teori Sosial Hegemonik, Penerbit: Lembaga Pengkajian Agama dan Masyarakat (LPAM), Surabaya.
Mantra, Ida Bagoes. 2004. Filsafat Penelitian dan Metode Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. On Social Psychology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Fourth Impression. 1972.
Morgan, Gareth. 1980. Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 605-22.
Muhadjir, Noeng. 2000. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi IV. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.
Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.
Poloma, Margaret M. 1984. Sosiologi Kontemporer. Yayasan Solidaritas, Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada.
Ryan, Bob; Robert W. Scapens and Michael Theobold. 2002. Research Methods and Methodology in Accounting and Finance, 2nd Edition. Thomson, London.
Sarantakos, Sotirios. 1993. Social Research. Macmillan Education Australia Pty, Ltd, Melbourne.
Scapens, Robert W. 1991. Management Accounting: a Review of Recent Developments, 2nd Edition. MacMillan, London.
Scapens, Robert W. and J. Arnold. 1986. Economics and Management Accounting Research, in Michael Bromwich and Anthony G. Hopwood. 1986. Research and Current Issues in Management Accounting. Pitman: pp. 78 - 102, London.
Shibutani, Tamotsu. 1986. Social Process. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sunarto, Kumanto. 1985. Pengantar Sosiologi: Sebuah Bunga Rampai, Jakarta: YOI.
Suriasumantri Jujun S. 2003. Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Triyuwono, Iwan. 2000. Organisasi dan Akuntansi Syan'ah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit LkiS.
Triyuwono, Iwan. 2006. Perspektif, Metodologi, dan Teori Akuntansi Syan'ah. Jakarta: Penerbit Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wallace, Ruth, and Alison Wolf. 1986. Contempoorary Sociological Theory. Fifth edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Zeitlin, Irving M.1995. Memahami Kembali Sosiologi, Kritik Terhadap Sosiologi Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: Gadjahmada university Press.