TINJAUAN WAKTU DAN BIAYA MENGGUNAKAN METODE  PERCEPATAN (CRASHING) DENGAN PENAMBAHAN JUMLAH TENAGA KERJA PADA PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN KANTOR KEJAKSAAN KOTA PONTIANAK KALIMANTAN BARAT

Fahmi Virgarif; didik nurharis; Azza Arena

Fahmi Virgarif Politeknik Negeri Pontianak
didik nurharis
Azza Arena

Abstract

The District Attorney's Office is one of the government-owned buildings. This building has legal services such as legal consultation, ticketing, reports and complaints. To create a more comfortable and conducive public service atmosphere. The prosecutor's office was renovated by increasing the number of floors and building area and using reinforced concrete construction. Effective and efficient in construction projects is important, because there are a series of work mechanisms, each of which influences each other. An important thing that must be seen in a construction is cost, time, human resources, occupational health safety management system (SMK3) and project communication management. The calculation of crashing with the alternative of increasing the number of workers, the duration obtained is 2621 days with a normal duration of 3276 days, so the difference is 655 days. Calculation of crashing with the alternative of increasing the number of workers, obtained the number of workers by 25%, namely 368 people, with a normal workforce of 1471 people. The total cost for crashing is Rp. 8,983,027,796.81 with the normal cost of Rp. 8,800,156,476,89. So an additional fee of Rp. 183,031,862.95 was obtained. Normal direct costs are Rp.6,956,645,315.62 while normal indirect costs are Rp.1,843,511,161.27. The direct cost of crashing is Rp. 7,139,677,179 while the indirect cost of crashing is Rp. 1,843,511,161.27. With a total normal cost of Rp. 8,800,156,477,89 and crashing costs of Rp. 8,983,188,341.84. Analysis of human resources, obtained a total wage of Rp.508.880.304 workers and obtained a total of 4084.6 people. APD (Self Protection Equipment) and APK (Work Protection Equipment) which used by workers, was identified the risk of each work carried out while the project is being implemented. Communication in a project is very important to do to achieve maximum project results and minimize errors in project work.

References

1) Soehendradjati, R. J. B. (1987). Manajemen Konstruksi. Jurusan Teknik Sipil,
Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
2) Husein, A., & Perencanaan, M. P. (2011). Penjadwalan, dan Pengendalian Proyek (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

3) Santoso, W. (2018). Analisis percepatan proyek menggunakan metode crashing dengan penambahan jam kerja empat jam dan sistem shift kerja (Studi kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Animal Health Care Prof. Soeparwi, Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan UGM, Yogyakarta) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

4) Kinasih, A. P. (2018). Evaluasi Waktu Dan Biaya Dengan Metoda Crashing Pada Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Sakit Uii (Time And Cost Evaluation Using Crashing Method On Uii Hospital Construction Project) (Master's thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

5) Soeharto I, (1995), Manajemen proyek dari konseptual sampai operasional, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.

6) Soeharto I, (1997), Manajemen Proyek, edisi kedua, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.

7) Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 28 / PRT / M / 2021 tentang Pedoman Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan.

8) Jawat, I. W., & Suwitanujaya, I. N. (2018). Estimasi Biaya Pencegahan Dan Pengawasan K3 Pada Proyek Konstruksi. PADURAKSA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Warmadewa, 7(1), 88-101.

9) Tarwaka. 2008. Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja Manajemen dan Implementasi K3 di Tempat Kerja. Surakarta : HARAPAN PRESS.

10) Anggraeni, E. R., Hartono, W. & S., 2017. Analisis Percepatan Proyek Menggunakan Metode Crashing dengan Penambahan Tenaga Kerja dan Shift kerja. e-jurnal matriks teknik sipil, pp. 610-611.

11) Santoso, W., 2017. ANALISIS PERCEPATAN PROYEK MENGGUNAKAN, Yogyakarta: UII.

12) Santoso, W., 2017. Analisis percepatan proyek menggunakan metode crashing dengan penambahan jam kerja empat jam dan sistem shift kerja, Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.

13) Anggraeni, E. R., Hartono, W., & Sugiyarto, S. (2017). Analisis percepatan proyek menggunakan metode crashing dengan penambahan tenaga kerja dan shift kerja (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Hotel Grand Keisha, Yogyakarta). Matriks Teknik Sipil, 5(2).

14) Ervianto, W. I. (2005). Manajemen proyek konstruksi. Andi, Yogyakarta.
15) Anggraeni, E. R., Hartono, W. & S., 2017. Analisis Percepatan Proyek Menggunakan Metode Crashing dengan Penambahan Tenaga Kerja dan Shift kerja. e-jurnal matriks teknik sipil, pp. 610-611.
16) Santoso, W., 2017. ANALISIS PERCEPATAN PROYEK MENGGUNAKAN, Yogyakarta: UII.
17) Santoso, W., 2017. Analisis percepatan proyek menggunakan metode crashing dengan penambahan jam kerja empat jam dan sistem shift kerja, Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.
18) Data Proyek Kejaksaan Negeri Kalimantan Barat. 2021

19) Ervianto, 2002. Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi, Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta : Salemba Empat.

20) Undang-Undang Dasar No.42, 2009. Pasal 7 Tentang Pajak Penambahan Nilai (PPN)

21) Peraturan Presiden No.70, 2012. Keuntungan Pengadaan Jasa